Is this routing behaviour as expected?

[Babak Vahdat]

Hi

I'm still a bit confused regarding a question by another thread and would
like to ask you about the point I'm missing here.

The following test passes (e.g. using the trunk code or 2.10.0 release)
which I can follow and understand:

public class TwoRoutesTest extends CamelTestSupport {

    @Test
    public void test1() throws Exception {
        getMockEndpoint("mock:result").expectedBodiesReceived("another
body");
        getMockEndpoint("mock:result2").expectedBodiesReceived("another
body");

        template.sendBody("direct:start", "body");

        assertMockEndpointsSatisfied();
    }

    @Override
    protected RouteBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
        return new RouteBuilder() {
            @Override
            public void configure() throws Exception {
                from("direct:start").to("direct:process").to("mock:result");

                from("direct:process").process(new Processor() {
                    @Override
                    public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception
{
                        Object body = exchange.getIn().getBody();
                        exchange.getIn().setBody("another " + body);
                    }
                }).to("mock:result2");
            }
        };
    }
}

Now consider the following test which is similar to the previous one but
this one would fail:

public class TwoRoutes2Test extends CamelTestSupport {

    @Test
    public void test2() throws Exception {
        getMockEndpoint("mock:result").expectedBodiesReceived("a", "b",
"c"); // changing to "a,b,c" will make the test to pass
        getMockEndpoint("mock:result2").expectedBodiesReceived("a", "b",
"c");

        template.sendBody("direct:start", "a,b,c");

        assertMockEndpointsSatisfied();
    }

    @Override
    protected RouteBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
        return new RouteBuilder() {
            @Override
            public void configure() throws Exception {
                from("direct:start").to("direct:process").to("mock:result");

                from("direct:process").split(body()).to("mock:result2");
            }
        };
    }
}

That's in contrast to the first test by the second test the outcome of the
second route (InOut) is not taken into the account by the direct producer
(...to("direct:producer")...) which to my understanding should have been set
as the body of the Out Message of the current Exchange by the first route,
that's in consistence with the first test.

Is this behaviour "worked as designed"? To me this's a bug or let's say it's
a "not consistent". Does this behaviour have anything to do with the UoW
stuff.

Thanks in advance for any advice
Babak



--
View this message in context: 
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-this-routing-behaviour-as-expected-tp5717331.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.