Hi

This questions has been posed first at StackOverFlow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13758380/apache-camel-request-reply-without-activemq-jms



On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:20 AM, santhosh <ramukhsohtna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  0 down vote favorite
>
>
> My requirement is to have a web service which will receive the request from
> clients and then route through camel,enrich it and forward it to another
> webservice at other clients place ,get response and send it back to the
> original requestor.
>
> from(webserviceURI)
>   .inOut().to("jms:queue:INQueue?replyTo=OUTQueue?replyToType=Exclusive");
>
> from(jms:queue:INQueue).to("http:X").to(jms:OUTQueue)
>
> I am understanding correct.Do we need to set ReplyTo header if we do this. I
> guess this solves the problem .Earlier in a post at stackExchange
> (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10253656/how-to-connect-an-apache-camel-synchronous-request-reply-endpoint-with-asynchron),
> Claus  had explained there is no need to set correlation id as camel does it
> automatically if it isnt assigned.
>
> My questions are we are looking ultra light weight implementation.we might
> have to contend with memory as low as 300 MB.No activeMQ,no SMX.Just going
> with karaf.what is the best jms provider if we need to use jms that has
> small footprint.or is activemq ok.
>
> I also thinking of doing this
>
> <from uri="cxf:bean:cxfProxyEndpoint?dataFormat=MESSAGE" />
> <camel:convertBodyTo type="java.lang.String"></camel:convertBodyTo>
>
> <to uri="http://X:8080/X";>
>
>
> The cxf proxy webservice has operations that returns a value.So we receive
> the request ,send it to preprocessors and then call remote webservice as
> http endpoint ,get the response ,post process it and the response is message
> at end of route(am i correct).My question would the request and response
> match.How should i test it.we also will be multicasting the request from
> proxy to various http endpoints and aggregating the replies before sending
> it out to client requestor.Should i really proceed in this route or is it a
> poor design.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Request-Reply-pattern-without-jms-tp5723754.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Reply via email to