It's what you described to do. Your suggestion (putting all endpoint uri strings into one) doesn't work. With the example I sent to you, you can send a message to endpoint "direct:a", "direct:b", "direct:c" and "direct:d" and all routed in the same way. Wasn't this your question?
Best, Christian On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:26 AM, liugang <clevers...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Christian: > > I'm not sure it's the same meaning: one is a single string; one is multiple > strings. > > But anyway, thanks for your response. > > Thanks. > GangLiu > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Müller [mailto:christian.muel...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:13 AM > To: users@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: Multiple Endpoint URLs defined at one component > > Why you didn't try it out? It's so simple: > > import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder; > import org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint; > import org.apache.camel.test.junit4.CamelTestSupport; > import org.junit.Test; > > public class CamelMultipleEndpointsTest extends CamelTestSupport { > > @Test > public void test() throws Exception { > MockEndpoint mock = getMockEndpoint("mock:end"); > mock.expectedBodiesReceived("a", "b", "c", "d"); > > context.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder() { > public void configure() { > from("direct:a", "direct:b", "direct:c", "direct:d") > .to("mock:end"); > } > }); > > template.sendBody("direct:a", "a"); > template.sendBody("direct:b", "b"); > template.sendBody("direct:c", "c"); > template.sendBody("direct:d", "d"); > > mock.assertIsSatisfied(); > } > } > > And yes, it's possible (with a slightly different syntax). > > Best, > Christian > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:59 AM, liugang <clevers...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All: > > > > I'd like to know it's there any Camel component which support to define > > multiple consumer(provider?) endpoint urls in it? For example: > > > > from("XXX:direct:a, direct:b, > direct:c,jms:queue:a,...").to("..."); > > > > in this case, the "from" can handle the massage no matter it sends to > > "direct:a", "direct:b", "direct:c" or "jms:queue:a". > > > > > > Thanks > > GangLiu > > > > > > > > > -- > > --
