Hi,
I think for the interface Registry a method bind() should be defined.
Here comes the explanation why:
Finally I managed to create a camel context component to put a route in
a black box. But I want to put this context component into a library and
hide it behind an API.
Starting point was the description in
http://camel.apache.org/context.html and the detailed example in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/camel-context/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component/context/JavaDslBlackBoxTest.java?revision=1069442&view=markup
In the given example, the blackbox is not put in a separate library. But
if I put it in a library it looks this way:
public class ContextComponent {
public static CamelContext createContext() throws Exception {
DefaultCamelContext atsm_context = new DefaultCamelContext();
atsm_context.setName("ATSM");
atsm_context.addRoutes(new ContextRouteBuilder());
atsm_context.start();
return atsm_context;
}
}
public class ATSMTest extends CamelTestSupport {
@Override
protected JndiRegistry createRegistry() throws Exception {
JndiRegistry registry = super.createRegistry();
CamelContext atsm_context = ContextComponent.createContext();
registry.bind("atsm", atsm_context);
return registry;
}
@Override
protected RouteBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
return new RouteBuilder() {
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
...
}
};
}
@Test
public void TestRoute() throws Exception {
...
}
}
The drawback here is, that the registry binding has to be done in the
application not in the library.
I tried to give the registry reference to the createContext( Registry
registry), to call the bind() method. But then I have to cast the
registry to JndiRegistry, to call bind(). So this would only work if the
application uses a JndiRegistry.
If the interface Registry would define a bind() method, this would work
for all registry kinds.
(For SimpleRegistry the bind() method have to call put() internally).
Is my idea correct or would this lead to other problems?
Thanks, Sven
