Hi, can you try to set the exception on the exchange instead of throwing it? If that's the case then I think there might a bug in SedaConsumer which propagates back exceptions on the exchange but doesn't propagate thrown exceptions.
Bilgin On 24 May 2013 12:31, dancerjohn <winddancerj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I disagree... the javadoc for ProducerTemplate.sendBody() states "Notice: > that if the processing of the exchange failed with an Exception it is > thrown > from this method as a CamelExecutionException with the caused exception > wrapped.". So if an exception is thrown during processing sendBody should > throw a CamelExecutionException. > > The point I am making is that when the channel is a direct channel this > DOES > happen. However, everything else being the same if the channel is a stub > this DOES NOT happen. Therefore there is a difference in the components > between direct and stub in this regard. This seems surprising. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Why-doesn-t-the-stub-component-throw-exceptions-in-tests-tp5733041p5733083.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
