Hello,

thx for the reply.
I've updated to camel 2.11.0 and java mail 1.5 before I've begun the
testing.
So all the log's from the previous posts are already from the newest
version.

On my local system I've tested the workaround with fetchSize=1, here both
versions 2.6.0 and 2.11.0 are working for me.
So we decided to get this workaround to the customer system(2.6.0), but here
the workaround is not working.
I have not found out what is the difference between the customer system and
my testings, but I don't think it is fixed in 2.11.0.
I haven't found something new in this log files, all information is also
included in the logs I've posted in the previous posts.

However, if you still need more log entries, I can post them if you want.  

kind regards,
Christoph


Christian Mueller wrote
> As I already mentioned, Camel 2.6.0 is really old (released in Jan. 2011)
> and not supported anymore by Apache Camel.
> 
> The reason why I ask to upgrade you application is to check whether this
> issue still exists with the actual version or not.
> 
> Camel-mail 2.11.0 use the following dependencies (I skipped the test
> dependencies):
> [INFO] org.apache.camel:camel-mail:bundle:2.11.0
> [INFO] +- org.apache.camel:camel-core:jar:2.11.0:compile
> [INFO] |  \- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.6.6:compile (version managed from
> 1.6.6)
> [INFO] +- javax.mail:mail:jar:1.4.5:compile
> 
> Can you re-run the failing tests in DEBUG mode (enable DEBUG log level for
> Camel) and share the log with us?
> At the moment I'm wondering why we have fetchSize and maxMessagesPerPoll
> and what the difference should be...
> 
> Best,
> 
> Christian Müller
> -----------------
> 
> Software Integration Specialist
> 
> Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
> V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
> Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html





--
View this message in context: 
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/MailComponent-MailConsumer-misses-Mails-tp5733010p5734253.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to