I think you are looking for [1].

[1] http://karaf.apache.org/manual/latest-2.3.x/users-guide/failover.html

Best,
Christian
-----------------

Software Integration Specialist

Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:34 PM, deepak_a <angesh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In my architecture, I have a Master/Slave set up of ActiveMQ (integrated
> with JBoss).
> ActiveMQ in master: tcp://localhost:61616
> ActiveMQ in slave: tcp://localhost:61617
>
> Camelcontext(s) runs in a separate VM.
> So I have 2 instances of camel context running (one for master one for
> Slave)
>
> Following is the CamelContext set up in Master
> failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61617)?randomize=false
>
> Following is the CamelContext set up in Slave
> failover:(tcp://localhost:61617,tcp://localhost:61616)?randomize=false
>
> Idea is that if the master ActiveMQ goes down, there should be a seamless
> switch over (which it does).
>
>
> Problem I am facing is - specifically when the slave starts up, presumably
> the camel context and
> routes will be built even though the (slave) broker is not actively
> processing messages.
>
> The master will have a comparable camel context, and I'm worried
> about interference between the two Camel Context. How do the routes on the
> slave know not to try to do their processing? Some routes in these contexts
> will reference broker endpoints, but some may do things like hit external
> endpoints, which would be bad if this is competing with the comparable
> processing on the master.
>
> *Note:* I have tried setting autoStartup="false" (in the Slave's
> CamelContext) but this did not make any difference.
>
> regards,
> Deepak.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-in-Master-Slave-ActiveMQ-config-tp5734804.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to