Hi You cannot do this using onCompletion. For 2 different TX in the same unit of work, you can use the propagation behaviors with REQUIRES_NEW to start a new TX for the 2nd part.
This use-case is covered in Camel in Action book from page 305 onwards. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:59 PM, dsemenov <sdo.seme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello colleagues > > I have a simple route > > <camel:camelContext id="upstream-entries"> > <camel:route> > <camel:from > uri="execMqOet:PWJMQM.GOM.GOMJULINT.DEV2?disableReplyTo=true"/> > <camel:onCompletion> > <camel:to "direct:separate_tx_route" /> > <camel:log message="in on completion" /> > </camel:onCompletion> > <camel:transacted ref="PROPAGATION_REQUIRED"/> > <camel:to uri="sql:INSERT INTO DISASTER values > (SEQ_TFI_TRADE_STATUS.NEXTVAL, #)?dataSourceRef=xaDataSource"/> > </camel:route> > </camel:camelContext> > > execMqOet is a transactional jms consumer which starts XA transaction. > I need to start another transaction in direct:separate_tx_route but it > should be started only if transaction finished in parent route. > > After some investigation i've found that onCompletion starts in another > thread (which is fine), when exchange is completed. But this doesn't mean > that transaction in parent route committed as well. > > How can i synchronize on completion block with transaction commit in parent > route? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Start-new-route-after-transaction-completed-tp5736661.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
