Hi There is a ActiveMQ mailing lists where this question is better posted.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Maurice <maur...@betzel.net> wrote: > Does activeMQ need our self created classes on its classpath if i externalize > these objects into java primitive types? My research sofar indicates that a > jms message type of bytestream with externalize should do the trick to avoid > the classpath issue. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Externalizable-and-the-activemq-classpath-tp5737384.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
