AWS SQS has different characteristics than ActiveMQ, you have to consider those too. It is priced per message, doesn't support FIFO, much slower, but distributed and HA...
Cheers Bilgin On 19 August 2013 16:11, deepak_a <angesh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, that was useful. > We are providing our Software as a Saas. > > Its sometimes hosted/deployed within our firm and at times deployed at the > client's site. > Now we plan to deploy our software in the cloud and provide it as a service > to clients. > > I am still trying to understand if there is any "value" in using AWS SQS. > As mentioned - we are able to achieve HA & HS using current architecture - > so trying to understand if there is any value in using AWS SQS. (in which > case my architecture will change a lot to use SQS) > > regards > D > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/When-to-use-AWS-SQS-tp5737514p5737518.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
