Hi Camel users My Camel is currently a bit wrong-headed and so I am riding down another path than the one I am expecting.
I have attached a small example project that is based on Camel 2.9.8 and the problem occurs with errorhandling and adviceWith. I have a route with a default errorhandler with redelivery configured and an additional onException block for a specific exception that does no redeliveries. Let's start with the working example (see "FullErrorHandlingTest" in example project): If I create the route with a "built in" exception (hardcoded in the route) according to the onException block, the block catches the exception correctly and does no redelivery. All is fine. Now the strange behaviour (see "ErrorHandlingAdviceTest" in example project): If I create the same route, but omit the last step and instead add this same last step in the TestCase with "adviceWith", the block does NOT catch the exception and the default errorhandler does the configured retries. Therefore the question: is "adviceWith" raising issues with errorhandling? Or is the strange behaviour due to a mistake I made? I would like to create automated tests to control the route flow for different errors. Thanks for any help Stephan
camel-errorhandling.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
