The headers should still be there in the Exchange. We will be altering only
Body of the exchange if I am not wrong. Would be good if some experts from
this forum would comment on that.

JAXB will only convert the Java object into equivalent XML representation.
I don't think so it would help you keep the SOAP envelop.

I am wondering if in the XSL file, you can compose the output to be in form
of soap envelop which will be readily processed by the cxf endpoint down
the route.


On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, chaij <jin.c...@indigoarc.com> wrote:

> Great stuff..
>
> But I assume this will only translate the body? How about the headers?
> Would
> that matter?
>
> Also, would camel be able to take the jaxb string and convert it into
> CXF_MESSAGE format? I am not quite clear how this works and didn't find
> much
> documentation talking about CXF_MESSAGE dataformat which is quite
> surprising.
>
> It seems that this is the only recommended way to use wss4j interceptors.
>
> If my incoming data format is also CXF_MESSAGE, how would I be able to
> convert that into POJO from my processor.
>
> Really appreciate.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-CXF-Proxy-with-WS-Security-tp5749223p5749229.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to