Thanks kraythe for reply ...appreciate it
The ordering is crucial for sub-set of those messages to be serve in FIFO
since its have impact on my business which may lead to "business" dead lock
if it not processed in the FIFS maaner . for example
imagine that message A which will debit customer1 account and credit
customer2 account , mean while customer2 send a message B to customer 1
which will credit customer 1 and debit customer 2 , here i'm in a risk of
insufficient fund or ( dead lock) if the messages not processes at the near
real time they come .
note :my business handle the dead lock insufficient fund case by re-ordering
the message manually . what i looking for is to minimize the occurrence of
that case specially if time when sending those messages is different (up to
1-3 seconds ).
I may change my approach and send those crucial messages from different
customers to single queue but i need to transfer some of my business which
decide if this message is crucial to customer side .
i hope the the case clear now
Thanks again .
-----
Othman Darwish
ProgressSoft Corp.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Consuming-messages-from-multiple-AMQ-queues-and-forward-it-to-single-AMQ-queue-concern-tp5752514p5752544.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
