Camel just copy a new exchange for bean expression to use, the attachment in the old exchange won’t be lost.
We don’t encourage the people to modify the exchange when doing the evaluation, otherwise the result will be changed in the next expression evaluation. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On July 4, 2014 at 3:43:01 PM, sabri.bousselmi ([email protected]) wrote: > I'm not Agree with you, otherwise attachments before evaluation will also be > lost. > I don't undersatand why for BeanExpression we cannot do both > modification(attach) + evaluation if is it possible. Bean process is not a > solution for me i'm following a specific pattern :( > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Attachments-are-Lost-using-Bean-Language-tp5753283p5753325.html > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
