Hi Kev, I believe you can use an exclusive fixed reply queue for that.
Please see: http://camel.apache.org/jms.html#JMS-AboutusingCameltosendandreceivemessage sandJMSReplyTo And especially see: http://camel.apache.org/jms.html#JMS-Request-replyoverJMSandusingasharedfix edreplyqueue I've had some trouble with this problem myself. Hopefully it helps you! Jeff On 7/10/14 5:51 AM, "kev" <kbo...@redhat.com> wrote: >Hi all > >I'm trying to create a Camel route that will post a message to a legacy >system with a JMS interface, and wait for a reply on a specific JMS queue. >This seems to be a pretty standard use of the inout exchange pattern. >However, the legacy system does not use the standard JSMCorrelationID >header >to associate outbound messages with their inbound requests. Instead, it >uses >an entirely non-standard header. > >As I understand it, if I use > >from (jms:something).inout(jms:something?replyTo=output_queue) > >then Camel will use JMSCorrelationID to match the inbound and outbound >messages. However, is there any way that inout() can be configured to use >some other header? > >If not, is there some other way to approach this problem using standard >Camel features? > >Thanks >Kev > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Using-non-standard-JMS-correlation-ID-tp >5753642.html >Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ________________________________ Please take note: This email, including attachments, contains information which may be confidential or legally privileged and is only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is properly addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited. If you have reason to believe that you have received this communication in error, or that it may be misaddressed or not intended for you, please destroy it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.
