Are you using the unit of work feature?
On 13 August 2014 13:36, Matt Wendling <mwendl...@ipass.com> wrote: > Hi Claus, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I need to rollback the transaction otherwise my DB statements will commit > and a JMS event will be sent. > > What is the point of the transaction if it's not rolled back on error? > > Is there no simple way to have the request / reply return immediately upon > an exception / transaction rollback? It's not really acceptable for my case > to have a timeout be the response. > > thanks, > > Matt > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Then you need to not rollback the tx, and handle the exception and > > return the response as the stacktrace. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Matt Wendling <mwendl...@ipass.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm using Camel with ActiveMQ and InOut request/reply routes. When I > > set > > > transferException=true i get the exception returned to the caller. > > However > > > if the route is transacted then the exception is NOT returned and I end > > up > > > with the 20000 ms timeout on the caller. > > > > > > Is there a way to get this exception and return it back to the caller > in > > a > > > transacted route? > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > Red Hat, Inc. > > Email: cib...@redhat.com > > Twitter: davsclaus > > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > > hawtio: http://hawt.io/ > > fabric8: http://fabric8.io/ > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
