Hi
Yes removeOnFailure will be called even if the exception was handled.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Chris Melikian <ch...@melikian.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So i'm using Camel 2.13.1 and the JDBC Idempotent Repository and I'd like to
> use the removeOnFailure
> =true option to be able to replay the transaction on failure.
>
> My question is whether implementing an onException clause which handles an
> exception would stop the removeOnFailure option from being carried out as
> the failure is being marked as 'handled=true'. Here is my onException clause
> in Spring XML:-
>
> <camel:onException>
> <camel:exception>java.lang.Exception</camel:exception>
> <camel:redeliveryPolicy logStackTrace="true"
> disableRedelivery="true" logExhausted="true"
> />
> <camel:handled>
> <constant>true</constant>
> </camel:handled>
> <camel:log
> message="Transaction has failed and is being
> handled by the exception
> handler. Received message [${exception}], full stack trace
> [${exception.stacktrace}]"
> loggingLevel="ERROR"
> logName="com.lgim.sophis.unrecoverableerror"></camel:log>
> </camel:onException>
>
> In the above case would the camel_messageprocessed table entry for the
> failing exchange be removed?
>
> Here is my route for idempotency:-
>
> <route id="idempotentTransactionsRoute">
> <from uri="direct:filterForIdempotency" />
> <idempotentConsumer
> messageIdRepositoryRef="jdbcIdempotentRepository">
> <el>${in.body.ID}</el>
> <to ref="direct:processTransaction" />
> </idempotentConsumer>
> <stop />
> </route>
>
> Any help appreciated!
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Idempotent-consumer-removeOnFailure-true-and-exception-handling-tp5756198.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
