Hi Thanks for that Claus. I thought it would be easy enough.
Regarding my first query, is it possible to configure Camel file2/ftp to consume the .data file, leave it on the server (as performed by noop=true) but remove the .ready file ? The reason is that we have multiple consumers (other than ServiceMix) of each .data file and each consumer gets a different .ready file when each .data is ready for collection. Any thoughts? James -----Original Message----- From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 October 2014 19:03 To: users@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions about doneFileName Hi See http://camel.apache.org/file-language.html You should use: doneFileName=${file:name.noext}.ready On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:53 AM, BURN, James <james.b...@oup.com> wrote: > Sorry I should add, this is using ServiceMix 5.3.0 and camel 2.13.2 > > Cheers > J > > -----Original Message----- > From: BURN, James [mailto:james.b...@oup.com] > Sent: 20 October 2014 09:48 > To: users@camel.apache.org > Subject: Questions about doneFileName > > Hi > > We are using ServiceMix to subscribe to a service by looking for "done files" > (.ready) before downloading a copy of the data (.dat) files. > > One problem we have is that once we have downloaded a copy of a data file we > must remove the .ready file but leave the .dat file > > Here is my route: > > <camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint"; > id="camel-ftpdownload"> > <route> > <from > uri="file:/data/readyfiletestIn/?doneFileName=${file:name}.ready&delete=false"/> > <to uri="file:/data/readyfiletestOut"/> > </route> > </camelContext> > > We've also tried noop=true but this leaves a .ready file once we have > downloaded a copy of the .dat. > > We can work around this by calling a XSLT next in the route to delete the > .ready file independently, but this seems to be compounding the route > complexity. > > Q2 - the doneFileNames we are get aren't necessarily the .dat file name with > a .ready extension. What is the best way to work with this. Ie where we want > to work with: > datafile123.dat and datafile123.ready rather than datafile123.dat and > datafile123.dat.ready ? > > Thanks > > James -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen hawtio: http://hawt.io/ fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
