Any thoughts on this issue or should I just create a ticket for it?
Kind regards,
Geert
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Geert Vanheusden <geer...@aviovision.com>
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I wanted to mock a "direct-vm" endpoint with the "block=true" option
> but it fails.
>
> Here you can find a unit test to reproduce this:
>
> ===================================
>
> import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder;
> import org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint;
> import org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultExchange;
> import org.apache.camel.test.junit4.CamelTestSupport;
> import org.junit.Test;
>
> public class DirectVmTest extends CamelTestSupport {
>
> @Override
> protected RouteBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
> return new RouteBuilder() {
>
> @Override
> public void configure() throws Exception {
> from("direct:in1")
> .to("direct-vm:out1");
>
> from("direct:in2")
> .to("direct-vm:out2?block=true");
> }
>
> };
> }
>
> @Override
> public String isMockEndpointsAndSkip() {
> return "(direct-vm:out1|direct-vm:out2)";
> }
>
> // @Override
> // public String isMockEndpointsAndSkip() {
> // return "*";
> // }
>
> // @Override
> // public String isMockEndpoints() {
> // return "(direct-vm:out1|direct-vm:out2)";
> // }
>
> // @Override
> // public String isMockEndpoints() {
> // return "*";
> // }
>
> @Test
> public void directVmEndpointShouldBeMocked() throws
> InterruptedException {
> MockEndpoint mockEndpoint = getMockEndpoint("mock:direct-vm:out1");
> mockEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1);
>
> template.send("direct:in1", new DefaultExchange(context));
>
> mockEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied();
> }
>
> @Test
> public void directVmEndpointWithBlockShouldBeMocked() throws
> InterruptedException {
> MockEndpoint mockEndpoint = getMockEndpoint("mock:direct-vm:out2");
> mockEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1);
>
> template.send("direct:in2", new DefaultExchange(context));
>
> mockEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied();
> }
> }
>
> ===================================
>
> The first test without the block succeeds but the second one with the
> block option fails.
>
> I tested it on version 2.14.0.
>
> Please also try to uncomment the code block to enable auto mocking and
> see the different test results.
>
> Seems to me like a bug. What do you guys think?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Geert
>
