OK do we need to wrap the process() with both un-marshal to a POJO
beforehand and marshal to XML/JSON afterwards, and wrap this in
decrypt/encrypt basically.

Not seeing examples showing the chaining together of marshal calls so
there's doubts in my mind reading this stuff.

On 24 December 2014 at 11:07, David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes - you got it - maybe an jaxbUnmarshaller if your byBusinessProcessor
> returns an jaxb object.
> Get that to work first - then you might want to use
> http://camel.apache.org/binding.html as well (which is really just
> syntactic sugar to make the dataformat a property of the
> endpoint/transport.
>
> 2014-12-24 11:29 GMT+01:00 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > So something like:
> >
> >
> >
> from("the.input.queue").unmarshal(cryptoDataFormat).unmarshal(jaxbMapper).process(byBusinessProcessor).marshal(cryptoDataFormat).to("the.output.queue")
> > ?
> >
> > Not entirely convinced I have this mentally modelled yet...
> >
> > On 24 December 2014 at 10:22, David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sure! The crypto is agnostic of transport and payload - stick it in
> > between
> > > the marshalling and the endpoint - and inbetween endpoint and
> > unmarshalling
> > > and you should be fit for fight.
> > > Good luck!
> > >
> > > 2014-12-24 11:17 GMT+01:00 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking at Camel's CryptoDataFormat and am wondering to what
> extent
> > > we
> > > > might employ it.
> > > >
> > > > In our use-case we want multiple Camel-powered JARs to send each
> other
> > > > messages via a message broker. Some of message needs to remain
> private
> > so
> > > > cryptography needs to be used. Right now we have routes that produce
> > and
> > > > consume from brokers and use jaxb classes for mapping to/from POJOs.
> > > >
> > > > http://camel.apache.org/crypto.html Does not really deal with
> anything
> > > > realistic - only mock endpoints. Can this be put into the above
> > > > applications?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
>

Reply via email to