No, I haven't, and you're right - I should have.  I'm an easily distracted
type though and I'm trying to get some ZCL stuff pushed to maven central
asap.  I use camel for a ton of testing of that kind of thing, and shortly
I'll be pushing out an xbee camel component I wrote (and am now testing).

Sorry for the lame answer.  If nobody knows what's going on here off the
top of their heads I'll dig into it in a little bit and report back.



On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Have you looked at the source code changes in camel-xmpp 2.15.0 and
> 2.15.1 and also about any JAR upgrades.
> The best clue would be in any of those changes.
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Christopher Piggott <cpigg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Earlier this evening I upgraded my camel project from 2.15.0 to 2.15.1
> with
> > no other code changes, and suddenly I was unable to connect to my XMPP
> > server.  The error I got was roughly this:
> >
> > "SASLauthentication failed using mechanism DIGEST-MD5:"
> >
> > I did some brief troubleshooting but was not able to solve the problem,
> so
> > I just dropped back to 2.15.0.
> >
> > Searching various mailing lists I found a number of people complaining of
> > the same problem; a ton of bad/unhelpful advice; and a good amount of
> > skepticism that it's even really a problem.  It certainly appears to be
> one
> > to me.  Permissions, keys, etc. dealing with this kind of stuff
> (including
> > self-signed certificates on openfire servers) has always been pretty ugly
> > in Java anyway.  Most of the time I can fix things by adding various
> trust
> > providers, or screwing around with keytool - but it's pretty hideous.
> >
> > I am following advice from the camel xmpp page and posting this to the
> > mailing list rather than filing a bug.  If someone believes this really
> is
> > a bug let me know and I'll be happy to fill out the ticket.  Or, of
> course,
> > if you have some workaround that will allow this to continue working,
> > that's great too.  Despite the fact that it's trying to use digest, it's
> > still inside of an SSL so I'm not overly concerned about it.  (I just
> don't
> > want to spend my life screwing around working around openfire).
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
>

Reply via email to