If you do some parallel processing and have an aggregation strategy for the 
results, just make sure to put the properties from the old exchange onto the 
exchange that you return.  Other than that, you’ll be fine.

~Danny

On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:18 PM, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> wrote:

> Thanks,  I will give it a try.
> 
> Do you know if there is some concern using exchange properties that I should 
> worry about, perhaps with multi-threading?
> 
> Best regards,
> Alex soto
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 10, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lamb <dan...@discoverygarden.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> Store the headers as properties on the exchange before filtering them out.  
>> Then you can pull them back out after you get your response from the remote 
>> server and do what you need to do.
>> 
>> ~Danny
>> 
>> On Nov 10, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> In case its not clear,  I need my custom headers for after the HTTP request 
>>> comes back,  I just don’t want these headers to go out to the remote 
>>> server.   Currently, I am using a headerFilterStrategy, but that seems to 
>>> remove the headers entirely, as opposed to filter them, as the name 
>>> implies.   
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alex soto
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 10, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I have a route with some custom headers that I need to preserve after 
>>>> sending an HTTP client request (HTTP producer),  however, I do not want 
>>>> these headers to be sent as HTTP headers to the remote server.
>>>> 
>>>> Is there a way to accomplish this?
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Alex soto
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to