Hi, But that's exactly what I found confusing: the option name "deadLetterHandle*New*Exception" suggests that we are configuring the behavior of the DeadLetterChannel in the case of a new exception only, while we actually also disable the handling of the original exception...
The unit test you linked only covers the case of an exception thrown by the original route *and* by the dead letter channel. The use case I am trying to discuss is the following: * deadLetterHandleNewException(false) * original route throws an exception * deadLetterChannel does NOT throw an exception Expected result: no exception was thrown back Actual result: the exception was thrown back ! Unfortunately, I could not find a Unit Test that covers this particular scenario. Please have a look at this one instead: DeadLetterChannelNoNewExceptionTest.java <http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5776125/DeadLetterChannelNoNewExceptionTest.java> -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/deadLetterHandleNewException-false-seems-to-not-work-as-expected-tp5775138p5776125.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
