Thanks Matt, so inOnly("direct:XXX") will not be asynchronous.
However what about the other side of the question (which is what I am mostly
intrested in)? Why isn't the OUT message lost at the end of the
[.inOnly("direct:BBB")] call?
I think I can summarise my question as follows :
How is [.inOnly("direct:BBB")] different than [.to("direct:BBB")] in the
examples I have provided? The results I get are the same regardless if I use
[.inOnly(...)] or [.to(...)].
Matt Sicker wrote
> The InOnly pattern is more of a one-way communication than it is
> asynchronous.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-understand-what-inOnly-is-doing-tp5787961p5788036.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
