How many producer templates would be produced? There's only a single
handler instantiated so if there are 5 routes that's 5 producer templates.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Steve973 <steve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd worry about the overhead of creating so many producer templates. I
> would probably set a header that contains a map of keys to destinations,
> then you could set a recipient list of one endpoint that contains the value
> at that key. Maybe brad's method isn't as overhead intensive because the
> template is injected, but this is more manual implementation than i would
> prefer.
>
> On Oct 24, 2016 9:21 AM, "Brad Johnson" <brad.john...@mediadriver.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is also one of those fuzzy areas where sometimes it is easier to
> > simply pass the message body into a bean and then use ProducerTemplate
> > instances to send values us different routes. Under normal
> circumstances I
> > wouldn't do it that way as Camel does a great job of heavy lifting. But
> in
> > some cases just using a Java bean is simpler and cleaner. Imagine having
> a
> > CityRouteHandler with one method on it.
> >
> >
> > public void routeToCities(Map<String, List<String>> myMap){
> > {
> > for (Map.Entry<String, List<String>> entry : map.entrySet()) {
> > if("Hyderabad".equals(entry.getKey()){
> > for(String message: entry.getValue())
> > hyderabad.sendBody(message);
> > ...etc.
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > You could then create a helper method as well that instead of looping
> > inside for each new entry and sending to the producer template, have the
> > helper method take the List<String> and producer template and loop inside
> > it. That would simplify the map code.
> >
> > The ProducerTemplate entries in this class would be declared something
> like
> > this:
> >
> > @InjectEndpoint(uri="direct:hyderabad")
> > ProducerTemplate hyderabad;
> >
> > I've written this free hand so while the ideas are correct I can't vouch
> > for the correctness of the code itself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:04 AM, raghavender.anth...@gmail.com <
> > raghavender.anth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks a lot for the response. This seems like useful, I'll give out a
> > try
> > > and will update you accordingly.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Raghavender Anthwar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.
> > > com/Dynamic-routing-based-on-collection-values-tp5789157p5789179.html
> > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
