There is no way that you can aggregate like that. Both messages need to be
sent to the same endpoint, and they need to have some sort of aggregation
id in order for the aggregation to know which messages to combine. Let me
know if this is unclear or if you need more information.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:06 PM, meng <tianmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I change to .aggregate(simple("${body}"), new
> JoinReplyAggregationStrategy()), now no exceptions, but only returns the
> second exchange from route 2. No original payload comes in to aggregate....
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.
> com/Problem-Concatenate-the-different-input-from-different-route-using-
> aggreagationStrategy-tp5789368p5789370.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
