Yes from Camel 3.0 the simple language would require ${ } syntax. Its
a bit to invasive to do this on 2.x
Just add something in from of "exception", eg "An exception was ..."
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:34 AM, erik_romson <e...@zenior.no> wrote:
> Hi
> I upgraded camel (2.18.1) and my error handling stopped working. I started
> looking at all the wrong places. Anyway I had the log statement
>
>
> .log(LoggingLevel.ERROR, "exception was caught when doing xyz")
>
>
> where the exception was expanded and tried to find the method " was caught
> when doing xyz"
>
> after reading the documentation, I can see that you can now write simple
> language without ${} (since 2.8) and when I look at
> org.apache.camel.language.simple.ast.SimpleFunctionExpression#createSimpleExpressionDirectly
> I can see that it is the case.
>
> Is this intentional? To find the method " was caught when doing xyz", I
> mean. Is it possible to turn this new feature off? I isn't uncommon to use
> the words "body" "exception" and "property" in log statments.
>
> See attached sample WeirdErrorTest.java
> <http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5793002/WeirdErrorTest.java> .
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Erik Romson
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/simple-variable-expansion-for-exception-and-finding-method-tp5793002.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
