Looks like you're connecting to a broker on localhost, which in docker is not the same.
On 23 Aug 2017 03:47, "Jeremy Deane" <jeremyde...@hotmail.com> wrote: > If start a local Spring-Boot App with a Camel Route listening to ActiveMQ, > itself either local or from a Docker Container, then the Camel Route > starts. > That in turns creates a connection to ActiveMQ and the queue that the Route > is polling. > > However, if I start that same Spring-Boot App (w/ Camel Route) in Docker, > then the Spring-Boot App Starts but not the Camel Route; nor does it > establish a connection. The weird part is that the ActiveMQ Camel Component > says it established a connection: > > /Successfully connected to tcp://event-broker:61616/ > > But when viewing the ActiveMQ Management Console there is no connection or > queue. And I see this output from the App logs regarding the Route: > > /Total 0 routes, of which 0 are started. / > > I posted a similar question, from a different perspective, with the Docker > details on StackOverflow: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45774973/docker- > user-defined-network-inter-container-communication-via-container-host-n > > The Spring-Boot App code is here: > > https://github.com/jtdeane/event-driven-microservices/ > tree/master/event-ingestion > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble. > com/Camel-Route-Not-Starting-in-Docker-tp5811844.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
