Hi Juza Thanks for announcing your project to the Apache Camel community.
I do hope your team will get chances to participate in the Apache Camel community as well, and based on your experience, be able to contribute here as well, whether its bug fixes, new components, improvements to documentation, etc. We are a very open and welcoming community, and have seen many people come and go over the last decade that Apache Camel has been around. I am glad to see new projects come and reuse parts of Apache Camel for whatever is being built and offered. For example my own employer does that in the JBoss Fuse product. However with my ASF hat on, then I am agreeing with Bilgin, that I see a concern with how you present your project on your website http://www.openhub.cz/ The first text that you will see is Apache Camel, but improved As I see it, there are 2 problems: 1) As Bilgin says, saying Apache Camel but improved, is misleading the users, as its NOT Apache Camel. There is only ONE Apache Camel. I would like to hear your thoughts on #1 and hear what we can do done to correct this. 2) When you mention any of the ASF projects, on your website or elsewhere, you must do this according to ASF trademark policy, in regards to ASF marks. You can read more about this here: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ For example Saviortech provides in the bottom of their website an attribution to ASF about using marks of the Apache projects that Saviortech uses on their website: http://www.savoirtech.com/camel I would like to hear your thoughts especially on #1 and hear what we can do done to correct this. For #2 then I would suggest to follow the example from Saviortech. However take a look at that link: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Bilgin Ibryam <bibr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello OpenHub, > > It is great to see another product based on Apache Camel. Seems like an > interesting stack with Camel, and hope you become even more successful, and > contribute back to Apache Camel to make it a better as well. > > I cannot resist express my personal opinion about one thing I dislike about > OpenHub - its tag line: “Apache Camel, but improved” > Looking at your architecture diagram, it seems it is another packaging of > Apache Camel with modern tools around it, which is great. That is a very > similar model to Talend ESB, JBoss Fuse, JBoss Switchyard, etc. None of > these projects are “Better Camel”, as Camel is a pure library that can be > embedded in all kind of stacks, and aforementioned projects are packaging > of Camel with other projects. > > So saying “Better Camel” is misleading as it implies OpenHub is an > equivalent of Camel, where in essence it is Camel with addons. > Don’t take this personally, I have been comparing Camel (to Spring Boot > which is actually something similar to Apache Camel), blogging, defending > Camel often and for over a decade there has not come another framework that > is in the same category as Camel but better. OpenHub is not an exception > here either. > > Hope you see my feedback as a constrictive one and it can help you make > OpenHub better. > Good luck and looking forward to see PRs to Camel and make it better ;) > > Bilgin > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Juza Petr <petrj...@openwise.cz> wrote: > >> Dear community, >> we would like to introduce to you our OpenHub framework - it’s still >> Apache Camel but with additional functions and with full application stack >> based on Spring Boot. >> >> Main OpenHub extensions (https://openhubframework.atlassian.net/wiki/x/QIM >> ): >> asynchronous messaging model >> parent-child concept >> obsolete messages >> guaranteed message processing order >> confirmation to callee system >> alerts and monitoring >> cluster support >> proven full application stack based on Spring libraries >> own admin console GUI >> >> URL: www.openhubframework.org <http://www.openhubframework.org/> >> GitHub: https://github.com/OpenWiseSolutions/openhub-framework < >> https://github.com/OpenWiseSolutions/openhub-framework> >> Doc: https://openhubframework.atlassian.net <https://openhubframework. >> atlassian.net/> >> >> >> Articles on JavaCodeGeeks: >> Introducing OpenHub framework - https://www.javacodegeeks.com/ >> 2017/10/introducing-openhub-framework.html <https://www.javacodegeeks. >> com/2017/10/introducing-openhub-framework.html> >> Asynchronous communication made by OpenHub framework - >> https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2017/10/asynchronous- >> communication-made-openhub-framework.html <https://www.javacodegeeks. >> com/2017/10/asynchronous-communication-made-openhub-framework.html> >> Next Interesting Features - https://www.javacodegeeks.com/ >> 2017/11/openhub-framework-next-interesting-features.html < >> https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2017/11/openhub-framework- >> next-interesting-features.html> >> >> >> Please, we would like to get feedback from you. >> >> Thank you very much. >> PETR >> >> ___ _ _ _ >> / _ \ _ __ ___ _ __ | | | |_ _| |__ >> | | | | '_ \ / _ \ '_ \| |_| | | | | '_ \ >> | |_| | |_) | __/ | | | _ | |_| | |_) | >> \___/| .__/ \___|_| |_|_| |_|\__,_|_.__/ >> |_| version: 2.0.0-RC1 >> >> >> > > > -- > Bilgin Ibryam > ASF Member | Architect at Red Hat > http://ofbizian.com | @bibryam <https://twitter.com/bibryam> > > Kubernetes Patterns http://leanpub.com/k8spatterns (in progress) > Camel Design Patterns https://leanpub.com/camel-design-patterns -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
