It turns out the exchangePatter for JMS and ActiveMQ components also needs to be fixed to *common* type?
ср, 9 сент. 2020 г. в 15:31, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>: > Hi > > exchange pattern can be both consumer or producer. Usually you dont use it > on consumer as the component sets the most appropriate value. > On the producer it can be used for InOnly or InOut message pattern for > components that support both style. (such as JMS) > > replyTo was wrong in JMS - fixing that to be a common option. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:17 PM Mikhail Lukyanov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The same situation with replyTo > > > > In Table in is only consumer parameter > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > But in examples this parameter is used in producer > > [image: image.png] > > > > ср, 9 сент. 2020 г. в 14:32, Mikhail Lukyanov <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hello everyone. > >> > >> Why in docs > https://camel.apache.org/components/latest/jms-component.html path > >> paraments exchangePattern specified only by the consumer > >> [image: image.png] > >> although in the same place it is indicated in the example by the > producer > >> [image: image.png] > >> Is this parameter a consumer-only parameter or can it also be specified > >> in the producer? > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *With best regards, Lukyanov Mikhail* > >> *Tel: **+7-909-69-71-547* > >> > > > > > > -- > > *With best regards, Lukyanov Mikhail* > > *Tel: **+7-909-69-71-547* > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > -- *With best regards, Lukyanov Mikhail* *Tel: **+7-909-69-71-547*
