"Binding" sounds good to me, too. On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 7:07 PM Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi > > Yeah one of the hardest problem is naming, and after that renaming as > a lot of old stuff "expects" the old name. > > I am also leading to Binding, as we have other concepts in Camel K > that are neutral named (no Camel or product in the name) like > Integration, IntegrationKit. > And they are all in the same namespace, so there are no clash on > kubernetes. > > +1 for Binding > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:59 AM John Poth <poth.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for Binding > > > > Dropping the Kamelet part makes it clearer that you can bind more > > than just Kamelets. > > > > Keeping it as "Binding" gives Kubernetes users a pretty good idea of what > > it's going to do without reading the documentation. > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:04 PM Antonin Stefanutti > > <anto...@stefanutti.fr.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Hi Luca, all, > > > > > > +1 for Binding. > > > > > > Users in the Kubernetes ecosystem may already be familiar with the > term, > > > as it seems it's the choice made by projects like Knative and Service > > > Binding, > > > to convey the general concept of "integrating" in their respective > domain. > > > > > > I find projecting that concept into the integration domain to be a good > > > fit, which > > > Would materialises in Kubernetes as bindings.camel.apache.org< > > > http://bindings.camel.apache.org> resources. > > > > > > On 16 Aug 2021, at 10:27, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com > <mailto: > > > lburgazz...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > When the KameletBinding concept was introduced in camel-k, if was > meant to > > > bind two Kamelets and nothing more, but over time we have added more > > > capabilities, like: > > > > > > - support for processing steps to transform exchanges/messages > > > - support to address/source from different systems so the source/sink > does > > > not need be a kamelet anymore > > > > > > So I think the term KameletBinding is not more appropriate and to > reduce > > > confusion, we should try to find a better name. > > > > > > On top of my mind, I'd see the following names as a possible > replacement: > > > - Binding so leave Kamelet out of the game as Kamelets are one of the > > > option but not the exclusive on > > > - Connector as in essence, a KameletBinding describe how to connect A > to B > > > > > > Any opinion ? > > > > > > --- > > > Luca Burgazzoli > > > > > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > -- Tadayoshi Sato
