Hi Steve, Some ASF projects use it but the IDE setup step is reducing a bit contributions - even if I can agree camel build has way more issues - but since lombok is far to be mainstream - and it will be worse with java 17 - I guess it is part of the story there, but no legal issue AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 2 nov. 2021 à 21:40, Steve973 <[email protected]> a écrit : > Ok. Thanks, Claus. Do you mind explaining the rationale behind this? > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:39 PM Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We will not use lombock > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 21.23, Steve973 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello. I normally use lombok to take care of boiler plate code in > > projects > > > that I work on. I have noticed that lombok is not used in the camel > code > > > base. Is there something about it (licensing or something else) that > > makes > > > it unsuitable for camel? I am working on something in camel-core, and > it > > > would be great to be able to use it to keep things cleaner. But I > would > > > think that if it was acceptable in an apache project, people would > > already > > > be using it. Does anyone have the details on this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Steve > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > > >
