Hi One reason is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3193
However if you use IBM MQ and a fixed replyTo queue name, then maybe the simple message listener from spring is okay, with potential limitation of re-connection issues. On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:02 AM Ashutosh Vaish <ashutoshvaish6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We are using CamelJMS to connect with IBM MQ. We are doing request-reply over > JMS. It was identified that our camel app is continuously polling the reply > queues even when a unit of work was completed. I found that QueueReplyManager > is coupled with DefaultMessageListenerContainer. > CamelJMS allows consumerType for JMS consumer to be Simple/Default/Custom. > Why was it decided to use DefaultMessageListenerContainer for > QueueReplyManager? Can we give a consumerType choice for this pattern too ? > > Thanks, > Ashutosh -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
