Hello. I am binding a processor in the registry, which works fine. At some point, I unbind it, and then bind a different processor with the same bean name. I am even printing out the class name after I bind, in order to verify it.
The first print shows the original/temporary processor. After unbinding, it does not find the bean, so it is null. When I re-bind under the same name, it shows the proper class. So, that all seems like I would expect. However, when I send an exchange to a route to use this processor, which references the bean by name, it is still using the original/temporary processor that I used "unbind" on!. I confirmed this because that temporary processor prints out a LOG message at the error level. What could the problem be? Thanks, Steve
