I did build from source, and did include the vim25.jar. I have 2 interfaces that are bonded for all networks with 2 standard vSwitches. I have vSwitch0 for management and storage, and vSwitch2 for public and guest.
John Skinner Senior Systems Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing® Office +1.800.735.7104 Direct +1.515.612.7783 | Mobile +1.515.745.0248 john.skin...@appcore.com | www.appcore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The information in this message is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not print it or disseminate it or its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the e-mail file immediately thereafter. Thank you. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ilya Musayev" <imusa...@webmd.net> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:22:30 PM Subject: RE: VMware DomainRouter Is your eth1 - guest network and eth2 - mgmt. network? > -----Original Message----- > From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skin...@appcore.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:16 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: VMware DomainRouter > > Hello list, > > I just setup a CloudStack 4.1 environment with vSphere 5.1. Everything > seems to be working ok for the most part. However, I have noticed that my > domain routers are getting created with a management IP address for the > control network instead of a control network IP address (the link local IP > addresses). Is this expected behavior?
