Openshift, to best of my knowledge, leverages advanced SELinux rules and not LXC for their cartridges. They presented on CCC13 and when asked why would you not run LXC instead, response was "we don't think its mature enough"... I don't know what to make of their response, but I guess being redhat they would know better.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Teipel, Bjoern [mailto:bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:18 AM > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: LXC > > No I didn't try yet, but I will. > Following the lxc and open shift projects right now and both are pretty > interesting to me since they provide a pass feeling like Heroku > > > On Sep 24, 2013, at 12:08 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:48 AM, Bjoern Teipel > <bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com> wrote: > >> > >> A question came up if LXC might be useful for cloudstack and I personally > agree that's a pretty interesting product for all those internet guys like me > who runs their hardware to the extreme. > >> I came today across an interesting podcast > >> > (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/01/speaking_in_tech_episode_69/ > >> ) which covers also the announcement of Openstack and AWS API and > >> they mentioned LXC support's being developed on. More info at > >> http://tech.gilt.com/post/41713823209/adding-lxc-support-to-cloudstac > >> k So I hope we'll getting a new toy pretty soon ... > > > > did you check the wiki link on that page: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LXC+Support+in > + > > Cloudstack > > > > I haven't tried it, but any user feedback would be great. > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Bjoern > >
