Nikolay, Getting back to this, did you file a bug for it ?
http://issues.apache.org select the CLOUDSTACK project that way we can track it and make sure it's indeed a bug and that it gets fixed. thanks, -sebastien On Oct 11, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Nikolay Kabadjov <niki...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Short update: > It turned out that deleted security groups ware in charge instead of deleted > users. > > We've managed to overcome by fixing the following codebase: > com.cloud.api.ApiResponseHelper.createUsageResponse > > 3259 } else if(usageRecord.getUsageType() == > UsageTypes.SECURITY_GROUP){ > 3260 //Security Group Id > 3261 SecurityGroupVO sg = > _entityMgr.findByIdIncludingRemoved(SecurityGroupVO.class, > usageRecord.getUsageId().toString()); > 3262 usageRecResponse.setUsageId(sg.getUuid()); > 3263 } > > > with > 3259 } else if(usageRecord.getUsageType() == > UsageTypes.SECURITY_GROUP){ > 3260 //Security Group Id > 3261 SecurityGroupVO sg = > _entityMgr.findByIdIncludingRemoved(SecurityGroupVO.class, > usageRecord.getUsageId().toString()); > 3262 usageRecResponse.setUsageId( (sg!=null)? > sg.getUuid(): "missing_security_group_" + usageRecord.getUsageId().toString() > ); > 3263 } > > Regards, > Niki > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:01 PM, Nikolay Kabadjov <niki...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > Nope! > no stack trace > > > > On Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > <alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On 10/10/13 9:31 AM, "Nikolay Kabadjov" <niki...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> The only > meaningfull line in the log is: >> 2013-10-10 18:29:06,063 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (ApiServer-3:null) >> unhandled exception executing api command: listUsageRecords >> java.lang.NullPointerException >> >> >> >> >> On Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:46 PM, Nikolay Kabadjov >> <niki...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> I've got the following response with no further explanation and no >> exceptions in the management-server.log related to the issue >> >> { >> "listusagerecordsresponse": { >> "errorcode": 530, >> > "cserrorcode": 9999 >> } >> } >> >> Any idea? >> How could I overcome this peculiar situation? >> >> Thanks, >> Niki > > > Niki, is there a stack trace for the NPE? Without the line number its hard > to tell where it fails.
