The 64 bit requirement on the host I believe is a hw requirement not a 
hypervisor os. Eg XenServer is 32 bit (at least up to 6.1). 

> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:09 AM, Shanker Balan <shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> On 16-Nov-2013, at 7:52 pm, 5度倾斜 <465296...@qq.com> wrote:
>> 
>> thank you for your suggestion :D
>> I made CloudStack4.2.0 started successfully, by install a 64-bit Ubuntu 
>> server OS rather than the old 32-bit one.
>> Reboot can't solve the problem,i've tried many times,and i still don't know 
>> the reason,maybe just don't suppport 32-bit OS ?
>> best wishes for you,thank u!
> 
> 
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#minimum-system-requirements
> 
> 64-bit is a pre-req for both management server and hypervisor hosts.
> 
> 
> --
> @shankerbalan
> 
> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, 
> Bangalore - 560 055
> 
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
> trademark.

Reply via email to