Why don¹t you create a portal and allow to end users choose their
requirements and send it to ACS via API , then you can achieve what you
want
Maybe its not it ACS but Citrix also provide another software which is
cloud portal business manager which is do everything for you, you can
bundle related compute + storage and network offering as a bundle
Sorry, i¹m thinking when i wrote something add some notes on offerings for
example Storage Offering #1 - EMC VMAX (High I/O) (Not for Xen Server) :)
hehheheh

On 16/11/13 21:56, "Steve Searles" <ssear...@zimcom.net> wrote:

>I am looking for a little guidance in tying templates to compute
>offerings or filtering them in the instance deployment wizard. For
>example as we step through the wizard we can choose Zone -> Template ->
>Compute Offering, in our case it is possible to create an undeployable
>situation by choosing a compute offering where a host tag is defined but
>the template selected does not support the hypervisor in the host tag.
>
>For example,  I have both xenserver and vmware.  I have defined a compute
>offering with a storage tag for Fibrechannel storage that is not
>available on xenserver but you can still choose that compute offering
>after selecting a xenserver template which will make an undeployable
>situation.  Perhaps I am not using host/storage tags properly but they
>seem to be functioning as intended.  I am trying to make the deployment
>process as simple as possible for the end user and not allow them to
>choose incompatible offerings.  I fully admit that I may be looking at
>this wrong and am looking for some guidance on setting up the offerings.
>I have the following defined and it seems kind of a mess.
>
>
>Vmware-
>                Storage Offering #1 - EMC VMAX (High I/O)
>                Storage Offering #2 - EMX VNX (Standard I/O)
>                Storage Offering #3 -  EMC ISOLON (NFS/Replicated)
>
>XenServer Storage Offering #1 - EMC AX (Standard I/O)
>                      Storage Offering #2 -  EMC ISOLON (NFS/Replicated)
>
>
>
>Steve Searles
>
>


Reply via email to