Check your VM IP, default gateway, Is gateway set to router ip ? If router is really blocking traffic, check the router iptables rules.
Thanks, Jayapal On 25-Jan-2014, at 1:59 AM, Derek Cole <derek.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > To update anyone following: > > I have verified that my switch ports are correct and that both nics are > plugged into the the 203 vlan. When I was checking this out, I actually > changed the vlan of the storage network to be 203 (from 200) because I > think 200 was incorrect. > > Everything else was the same. I can still ping and connect out from the VR, > SSVM and that other system VM, but I cannot get out from the guest VMs. > When I do a traceroute to an external interface, the last hop is the VR. > When I try to do a ping or something I get Destination Host unreachable. > > Still at a loss here as to what is going wrong. > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Derek Cole <derek.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I saw those egress rules and I set it to allow all. If I try to ping >> out, I can see the request going through all of my system vms and the >> VR. Does this imply that this setup is correct and maybe I have some >> vlan problem on my switch? >> >> Sent from my Windows Phone From: Sanjeev Neelarapu >> Sent: 1/23/2014 11:59 PM >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Need help with advanced zone/2 nics >> Hi, >> >> If you have used the default network offering >> (DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService) to create the >> guest network then by default egress traffic is blocked because the >> egress default policy is set to denied in the default offering. >> You may need to allow the required traffic using egress rules. >> >> Thanks, >> Sanjeev >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Derek Cole [mailto:derek.c...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 5:13 AM >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Need help with advanced zone/2 nics >> >> Hello, >> >> I have attempted to set up an advanced zone, using xenserver, and >> giving my guest vm's their own CIDR of 192.168.0.0/24 >> >> I have two physical networks, and one of them i called "management" >> and one i called "traffic" >> >> I put public and guest traffic on "traffic" and storage and management >> on "management" >> >> My guest VM's get one network, which gives them an address from that >> 192.168.0.0 network, and they can ping each other. My virtual router >> has an internet connection and can ping out to the internet. What is >> failing is gaining internet access from my guest VM's. >> The VR gets 3 connections, a cloud_link_local_network, and an IP from >> my public CIDR, and an IP from my guest CIDR. >> >> It almost seems as if the VR isnt routing/NATing traffic to the >> outside world from the guest VM's. Can anyone tell me what may be >> wrong with my scenario? >> >> Pertinent info: >> >> storage range; 10.20.0.20-30 gw 10.20.0.1 vlan 200 Management range: >> 10.20.4.15-24 gw 10.20.4.1 public range: 10.20.4.25-254 vlan 203 gw >> 10.20.4.1 guest VLAN range 203-203 >> >> networks 10.20.0/24 and 10.20.4/24 are my enterprise networks that >> provide connectivity out to the world. >> >> Any insight is appreciated. THis is my first attempt at an advanced >> network after getting a simpler basic network up and going >>
