Hi Daan, Maybe I should have been clearer. I was wondering about the implications for performance. Would performance in a database clustering use case be better with plain Xen (or other virtualization solution), when compared to CloudStack with Xen? Or is this an unnecessary concern?
Also, is CloudStack aimed for clusters consisting of tens/hundreds of such rack servers, or is it suitable also for smaller deployments? Pekka -----Original Message----- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 3. maaliskuuta 2014 12:28 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Suitable solution for HW On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka <pekka.paakko...@vtt.fi> wrote: > Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice? I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack, Pekka. Using cloudstack you would still need a virtualization server like Xen. If you are on;ly using one and don't foresee any migration of running VMs go with that. If you have uptime requirements that span beyond the livetime of your hardware, use cloudstack. -- Daan
