Hi Elliot,
Reboot the router and see the management server for router startcommand.
These values are passed in startcommand.
If it has . at the end then check the database nics table for entry with guest
ip.
If nic table has entry with . then correct and restart the MS and restart VR.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 16-Jul-2014, at 3:39 PM, Elliot Berg <elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got
>
> template=domP name=r-27-VM eth0ip=10.4.2.6 eth0mask=255.0.0.0.
> gateway=10.0.0.1 domain=cs1cloud.internal dhcprange=10.0.0.1
> eth1ip=169.254.1.246 eth1mask=255.255.0.0 type=dhcpsrvr
> disable_rp_filter=true dns1=10.0.0.12 dns2= ip6dns1= ip6dns2=
>
> In that file, which includes the incorrect netmask.
>
> Elliot
>
> Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Check the /var/cache/cloud/cmdline for eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0
>> If it is correct, then interfaces file is written wrongly.
>> The /etc/network/interfaces updated from the cloud-early-config on router
>> boot.
>>
>> What you can do is put set -x in cloud-early-config and run
>> /etc/init.d/cloud-early-config from the router.
>> And observe the setup_interface for how /etc/network/interfaces is written.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jayapal
>>
>> On 16-Jul-2014, at 3:07 PM, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So that fails with the error
>>>
>>> Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "10.4.2.6/255.0.0.0.".
>>> Failed to bring up eth0.
>>>
>>> I went and looked at the router's /etc/network/interfaces file and spotted
>>> that the netmask has a "." on the end, as below. Removing that and then
>>> running ifup eth0 works, however when I reboot the router that file appears
>>> to be regenerated, as my change was undone. Does anyone know where the
>>> information to generate that file comes from?
>>>
>>> iface eth0 inet static
>>> address 10.4.2.6
>>> netmask 255.0.0.0.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Elliot
>>>
>>> Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:
>>>> Hi Elliot,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please try 'ifup eth0' on the router.
>>>> It seems there is delay in bringing up the eth0 interface.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jayapal
>>>> On 16-Jul-2014, at 12:40 PM, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've already had to flatten and start again so I'd rather avoid it - but
>>>>> my suspicion is that all of this is related to the kvm host's networking
>>>>> somehow. I followed the instructions on the cloudstack install guide, and
>>>>> ended up with the below - does it look right to you guys?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> auto lo
>>>>> iface lo inet loopback
>>>>>
>>>>> auto eth0
>>>>> iface eth0 inet manual
>>>>>
>>>>> auto cloudbr0
>>>>> iface cloudbr0 inet static
>>>>> bridge_ports eth0
>>>>> bridge_fd 5
>>>>> bridge_stp off
>>>>> bridge_maxwait 1
>>>>> address 10.4.0.2
>>>>> netmask 255.0.0.0
>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>>>>> broadcast 10.255.255.255
>>>>> gateway 10.0.0.1
>>>>> # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if
>>>>> installed
>>>>> dns-nameservers 10.0.0.12
>>>>> dns-search avco
>>>>>
>>>>> auto cloudbr1
>>>>> iface cloudbr1 inet manual
>>>>> bridge_ports eth0
>>>>> bridge_fd 5
>>>>> bridge_stp off
>>>>> bridge_maxwait 1
>>>>>
>>>>> Many Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>
>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cloud.log contains the following just after the machine's rebooted;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:06 UTC 2014 checking that eth0 has IP
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:07 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=0
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:08 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=1
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:09 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=2
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:10 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=3
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:11 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=4
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:12 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=5
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:13 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=6
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:14 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=7
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:15 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=8
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:16 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=9
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:17 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=10
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:18 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=11
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:19 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=12
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:20 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=13
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:21 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=14
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:22 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=15
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:23 UTC 2014 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
>>>>>> timer=16
>>>>>> Mon Jul 14 16:01:23 UTC 2014 interface eth0 is not set up with ip...
>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I say, I'm wondering whether this indicates a more general networking
>>>>>> issue on the host, as I'd have expected the virtual router to sort its
>>>>>> own networking assuming the host's is fine?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Check the logs while the router is booting. Also check
>>>>>>> /var/log/cloud.log
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jayapal
>>>>>>> On 14-Jul-2014, at 2:39 PM, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did that earlier as part of the troubleshooting when it was stuck -
>>>>>>>> so I've just looked at the logs instead of recreating it again as that
>>>>>>>> was only just done. When you say the router logs, do you mean general
>>>>>>>> logs on the virtual router machine? If so,
>>>>>>>> syslog/messages/kern.log/daemon.log are all empty?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Elliot,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Try recreating router (destroy the router and deploy new vm, router
>>>>>>>>> get recreated).
>>>>>>>>> After recreation if the problem still exists, check the router logs
>>>>>>>>> to see why the interfaces are brought up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> jayapal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11-Jul-2014, at 1:38 PM, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm wondering whether the guest not having the interfaces
>>>>>>>>>> configured correctly (i.e. not having an IP) is just a symptom of
>>>>>>>>>> more generally broken networking - my interfaces file for the KVM
>>>>>>>>>> host is below, does anyone spot any issues?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> auto lo
>>>>>>>>>> iface lo inet loopback
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> auto eth0
>>>>>>>>>> iface eth0 inet manual
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> auto cloudbr0
>>>>>>>>>> iface cloudbr0 inet static
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_ports eth0
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_fd 5
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_stp off
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_maxwait 1
>>>>>>>>>> address 10.4.0.2
>>>>>>>>>> netmask 255.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>>> broadcast 10.255.255.255
>>>>>>>>>> gateway 10.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>> # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if
>>>>>>>>>> installed
>>>>>>>>>> dns-nameservers 10.0.0.12
>>>>>>>>>> dns-search avco
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> auto cloudbr1
>>>>>>>>>> iface cloudbr1 inet manual
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_ports eth0
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_fd 5
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_stp off
>>>>>>>>>> bridge_maxwait 1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Doh! I did, but forgot about it being on a funny port. Now that I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> into the VM I can see that it's not running, and fails to start
>>>>>>>>>>> when it tries to bind to the address that it should have on the
>>>>>>>>>>> guest range. I notice that "ifconfig -a" shows two NICs, only one
>>>>>>>>>>> of which is up (the one with the link local IP). I'm guessing that
>>>>>>>>>>> indicates a more general networking issue?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think how it's laid out is 10.4.0.0-255 for physical machines (1
>>>>>>>>>>> is the management server, 2 is the first host), 10.4.1.0-255 is the
>>>>>>>>>>> management network and 10.4.2.0-255 is the guest network...but it's
>>>>>>>>>>> possible I've misunderstood the networking config during setup?
>>>>>>>>>>> What I really wanted was hosts on 10.4.0.0-255 and guests on
>>>>>>>>>>> 10.4.1.0-255 (and beyond), as in the future I'd like it to co-exist
>>>>>>>>>>> with our existing infrastructure while we migrate things - but I
>>>>>>>>>>> kept being told about conflicts etc when I tried to set up
>>>>>>>>>>> cloudstack like that during the initial set up process?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Elliot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you ssh to VR using the ssh key ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ex: ssh -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p3922root@169.254.3.196
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If it is failed to ssh, then there is issue with the ssh keys.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jayapal
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09-Jul-2014, at 4:43 PM, Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patnala<harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Log into your KVM host.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Use command “virsh list”. This gives the list of VMs on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> host.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Use command “virsh console<VirtualRouterId>” to log into the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09-Jul-2014, at 3:52 pm, Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know - I can't seem to ssh to the link local IP. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pings, but ssh times out. If I try and use the "connect to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> console" button in the gui, that too times out :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the logs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014-07-08 12:08:56,218 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Seq 1-277348416: Processing: {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ans: , MgmtId: 159320647860937, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"grep:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases: No such file or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory","wait":0}}] }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you check whether dnsmasq service is running in the Virtual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Router ? if not, start the service and check for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “/var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08-Jul-2014, at 3:47 pm, Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've done that, and now there's a new virtual router which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says it's running, however a deployment still fails. My latest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of logs are available
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> athttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and there's now one thing in the op_it_work table with a step
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> != 'Done', which is a ConsoleProxy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly if I look at the console proxy vm in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloudstack management gui it says it's running, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes mark the VR to stopped, destroy VR, mark the VR entry in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> op_it_work to “Done” and try deploying VM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08-Jul-2014, at 12:44 pm, Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears to be stuck in the "starting" state - so I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the option to reboot it or anything. If I change the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state to stopped in the database directly will the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> management server attempt to start it again or do I need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do something more?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is your Virtual Router up and running ? If is in running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state you can mark it Done and deploy a VM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it is in stopped state try restarting it. You can try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updating the field as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 7:10 pm, Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can see two entries that have the "step" field set to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something other than "Done", one of them is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ConsoleProxy | Starting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the other is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DomainRouter | Prepare
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I safe to just delete the rows, or should I just update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the field?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> r-4-VM in “op_it_work” table ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are any, remove those entries and try VM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see in the logs that VR has a task pending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The task item for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not using the host, but I suspect that's just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I don't really know what I'm looking for - so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed it on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropbox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> athttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have more success!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else - everywhere I've looked for how to use local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> storage says I should change two global settings;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * system.vm.use.local.storage = true
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * use.local.storage = true
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I'm looking at my global settings and only the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first exists (which I have set to true).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of only looking for exceptions higher up before now),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've just spotted this...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-3:job-46
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speed=1000Mhz, Ram=1024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-3:job-46
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloudstack-host1, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this and try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ing other available hosts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something to do with it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg | Analyst Programmer/Network Team
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Tel: 01753 213700 |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web:www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England& Wales,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registration Number 1976620
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SL1 3UF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya musayev wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message that says CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found no suitable resources based on your configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any private info you dont want to share). I would also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommend cloudstack 4.3.1 (which is not officially out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet) but should come thru in the next several weeks. Its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latest stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with latest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we complete official release of ACS 4.3.1 process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source and Non-Open Source modules.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimentation purposes - right now we're just trying to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compare different platforms for private cloud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure before we start getting too in depth with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and I believe I've followed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the installation guides correctly at the various
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server, however we're interested in using local storage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the majority of things, and have also set up a single
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KVM host which I believe is all configured correctly to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use local storage. If I look at the dashboard, I'm told I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have more than enough resource in every section to create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an instance the size I want to - which is a small
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offering I've created with just 1.0GHz and 1GB of RAM,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with local storage. The host's not very powerful, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the dashboard I am using 1.50GHz/5.87GHz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.38GB/7.80GB, 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.03GB/450.99GB Local Storage and 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Storage (I'm assuming that's meant to be a combination of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NFS server's primary storage offering and the local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> storage on the host, though the numbers don't quite make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense at first glance).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work out why. I can't add an instance using a small
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared storage offering either, but if I'm not mistaken
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's expected because the zone and host are configured
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use local storage. The only thing I can think of is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the local storage isn't properly configured, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when I've looked it seems to be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great - thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
