Well not all of us have 10Gb networking and when copying the templates from secondary to primary the smaller the disk the faster it get to the customer. Resizing the disk on my san will be a lot faster than on my nfs server. I'm not sure why no one is really interested in it. I mean one template for all HD sizes sounds great as I don't have to create and maintain lots of different sizes. Also I would be able to bill by resource usages on the HD's just like ram and cpu and network. My Cloudstack is working just fine and we are ready to deploy but creating 64 different images to me doesn't sound fun.
Is password reset and hostname set working with these templates? -----Original Message----- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 10:27 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: ACS 4.4.0 - Xenserver OS Templates Hello, Check dl.openvm.eu for templates, they're mostly 8GB in size, with the hope root resize will become available across all HVs; though people do not seem very interested in it. What work around do you mean for linux and freebsd? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew Midgett" <clouds...@trick-solutions.com.INVALID> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 3 November, 2014 15:09:32 > Subject: ACS 4.4.0 - Xenserver OS Templates > How is everyone setting up their templates for different size hard drives? > Has anyone heard when root disk resize will be available for xen? It > would be far nicer to have 5GB templates and then resize the disk when > the customer provisions one. Is there any work around ATM for linux > and freebsd os? > > > > Matthew Midgett
