Officially, CephFS is NOT production ready - that being said by the Intank - you get your answer :)
On 4 November 2014 08:21, Stephan Seitz <s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 04.11.2014, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Vladimir Melnik: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Did anyone compare CephFS and GFS2 or did anyone read any articles about > > comparison of CephFS and GFS2 in regard to their performance? Alas, I > > haven't found anything on this topic. > > > > Right now I'm using GFS2 as a primary storage filesystem (it's > > accessible by iSCSI+multipath), but, of course, I'd like to gain more > > performance. Should I try CephFS as an alternative? > > Both techniques are quite different. In short, you shouldn't use CephFS > in favor of ceph's native RBD. > > I'll try to follow up later that day - currently in a hurry. > > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- Andrija Panić -------------------------------------- http://admintweets.com --------------------------------------
