We have tried removing primary storage and re added to CS. It got added sucessfully.
We have 2 xenserver cluster but in both cluster is behaving simillar way. We have updated xenserver 6.2 with all citrix recommend hotfixes. On Nov 26, 2014 11:13 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" < [email protected]> wrote: > Is the first added primary storage removed from the host ? > If it is not removed and trying to added again it will fail. > You can delete it using the xencenter or xsconsole. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > > > On 26-Nov-2014, at 11:04 PM, Tejas Sheth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Jayapal, > > > > initially storage gave error while creating zone after we added vhd-util > > so after it got attached. then we tried to reconfigure new zone with > > another pool after changing network bridge to openvswitch but still the > > same issue. > > > > follwoing is the error for SMlog > > > > Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] ['/usr/sbin/vgs', '--noheadings', > > '--nosuffix', '--units', 'b', > > 'VG_XenStorage-4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70'] > > Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] pread SUCCESS > > Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] ['/usr/sbin/vgs', '--noheadings', > > '--nosuffix', '--units', 'b', > > 'VG_XenStorage-4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70'] > > Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] pread SUCCESS > > Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SMGC: [4051] No work, exiting > > Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SMGC: [4051] SR 4436 ('CloudStore-1') (2 VDIs > > in 2 VHD trees): no changes > > Nov 26 22:11:24 cloud-host1 SM: [4154] ['bash', > > '/opt/cloud/bin/copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh', > > '10.3.4.40:/ibm/share1/template/tmpl/1/1/', > > '4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70', > > 'cloud-63ae2d9b-23ce-49cc-8b25-b534a3cf0451'] > > Nov 26 22:11:24 cloud-host1 SM: [4154] pread SUCCESS > > Nov 26 22:11:25 cloud-host1 SM: [4186] ['bash', > > '/opt/cloud/bin/kill_copy_process.sh', ''] > > Nov 26 22:11:25 cloud-host1 SM: [4186] pread SUCCESS > > > > thanks > > Tejas > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Tejas, > >> > >> Please check that your xenserver host copied with 'vhd-util' binary. > >> Also check the /var/log/SMLog in the host for more detailed logs for > this > >> error. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jayapal > >> > >> On 26-Nov-2014, at 9:51 PM, Tejas Sheth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> ISSUE!!!!!!! > >>> we are not using security groups but still bridge is configured. Zone > is > >>> created sucessfully but System VMs are not able to start. follwoing > error > >>> we are getting. > >>> > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) can not create vdi in sr > >>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) Catch Exception > >>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to > >>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in > sr > >>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to > there > >>> are 0 VDIs with name cloud-f4f8ad12-b315-4768-9e71-278041d6bb80 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) can not create vdi in sr > >>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) Catch Exception > >>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to > >>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in > sr > >>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,564 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to acquire lock on > >> VMTemplateStoragePool > >>> 24 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,567 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Failed to start instance > >>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-6-VM] > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,802 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) VM state transitted from :Starting to > Stopped > >>> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: > null > >>> host id before state transition: 2 > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,825 WARN [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Exception while trying to start secondary > >>> storage vm > >>> com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is > >>> unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null > >>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,828 INFO [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to start secondary storage vm for > >>> standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 6, will recycle it and start a > new > >>> one > >>> > >>> 2014-11-26 21:45:31,516 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-6761d068) Failed to start instance > >>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-10-VM] > >>> 2014-11-26 21:46:01,499 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > >>> (secstorage-1:ctx-1085a3ab) Failed to start instance > >>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11-VM] > >>> > >>> > >>> is it because of bridge configuration?? > >>> > >>> We are using FC storage and we have mounted primary storage using > >> presetup > >>> storage. HA is not configured on xenserver. > >>> what are the possible cause of above mentioned issue? > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance > >>> Tejas > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Tejas Sheth <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> We are getting following error: > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) can not create vdi in sr > >>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) Catch Exception > >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to > >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in > >> sr > >>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to > there > >>>> are 0 VDIs with name cloud-f4f8ad12-b315-4768-9e71-278041d6bb80 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) can not create vdi in sr > >>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > >>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) Catch Exception > >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to > >>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in > >> sr > >>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,564 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl] > >>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to acquire lock on > >> VMTemplateStoragePool > >>>> 24 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,567 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > >>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Failed to start instance > >>>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-6-VM] > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,802 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl] > >>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) VM state transitted from :Starting to > >> Stopped > >>>> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: > null > >>>> host id before state transition: 2 > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,825 WARN [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > >>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Exception while trying to start secondary > >>>> storage vm > >>>> com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is > >>>> unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null > >>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,828 INFO [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > >>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to start secondary storage vm for > >>>> standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 6, will recycle it and start a > >> new > >>>> one > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> is it related to bridge configuration???? > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Nux! <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> No, in Advanced Zone with SG - just like in Basic zone - there is no > >> per > >>>>> customer VLAN; there are no firewall, load balancer or additional > NICs; > >>>>> there is also no IPv6. > >>>>> > >>>>> A VM will just get a public IP via DHCP and that's it, the customers > >> are > >>>>> isolated via "security groups" which is a fancy name for iptables > >> rules. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hope this clears it up. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >>>>> > >>>>> Nux! > >>>>> www.nux.ro > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>>> From: "Tejas Sheth" <[email protected]> > >>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 10:14:11 > >>>>>> Subject: Re: security group and xenserver query > >>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks for simplification, > >>>>>> so it means that each account will have seprate VLAN with its own > >>>>> subnet > >>>>>> and those VLANs will be created and configured in physical switch? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> if architecture is above mentioned way configured then how can we > >>>>> achieve > >>>>>> NAT and loadbalancing? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> Tejas > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom < > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I like to think of Advanced Network with SG as simply multiple > Basic > >>>>>>> Networks, each on its own VLAN. You have the same features (or > rather > >>>>> lack > >>>>>>> of) as you would with a Basic Zone, but you have multiple Guest > >>>>> Networks. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Geoff Higginbottom > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>> From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>>> Sent: 26 November 2014 09:53 > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: security group and xenserver query > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> so NAT and loadbalancers are not possible if we use security group? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> so it meanse there will be no internal and external IPs for VMs. is > >> it > >>>>>>> correct? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> For SG networks there is no public network. > >>>>>>>> We configure public ips for the guest network. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -Jayapal > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 26-Nov-2014, at 12:00 PM, Tejas Sheth <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have made the bridge configuration, but when i am selecting > >>>>>>>>> advance zone. it is not showing public network configuration. > only > >>>>>>>>> guest and management is availabel. also internal CIDR ip > >>>>>>>>> configuration is also not available. > >>>>>>>>> i think it is cinverting to basic zone if we select security > group > >>>>>>>>> and xenserver as hypervisor. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>> Tejas > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> For 6.2 you no need to install CSP. My typo mistake in last > mail. > >>>>>>>>>> sysctl.conf is fine. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Jayapal > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 25-Nov-2014, at 8:45 PM, Tejas Sheth <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So can i take it as confirmation and proceed with only > following > >>>>>>>>>>> bridge configuration in xenserver 6.2? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> # xe-switch-network-backend bridge > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> # vi /etc/sysctl.conf > >>>>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 > >>>>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0 > >>>>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 1 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Require confirmation for sysctl.cnf configuration part. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Tejas > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> XenServer does not need any package to be expicitly installed. > >>>>>>>>>>>> When > >>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>> add host to CS it copies some files to the host itself and you > >>>>>>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>>>>> to bother about them usually. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Vadim. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:52 PM > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: security group and xenserver query > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Jayapal, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reply, I have understood the bridge configuration > >>>>> part > >>>>>>>>>>>> but can you clarify CSP package part. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> if CSP package comes with xenserver 6.2 then do we need to > >>>>>>>>>>>> install it explicitly? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It would be really helpful if you can send link to install CSP > >>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>> xenserver 6.2 because CS 4.3 document do not have description > >>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>> xenserver > >>>>>>>>>>>> 6.2 CSP installation. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tejas, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The network mode set to 'bridge' mode. > >>>>>>>>>>>> #xe-switch-network-backend bridge > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think Xenserver 6.2 comes with the CSP package, so you need > to > >>>>>>>> install > >>>>>>>>>>>> it explicitly. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jayapal > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 25-Nov-2014, at 4:47 PM, Tejas Sheth <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are configuring advanced zone in cloudstack 4.3 in > xenserver > >>>>>>> 6.2. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to configure security group in advance zone. do we > have > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to do any special configuration in xenserver 6.2. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> xenserver has default networking configuration. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tejas > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related > >>>>> services > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > >>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > >>>>>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework< > >>>>> http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > >>>>>>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ > > > >>>>>>> CloudStack Software Engineering< > >>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > >>>>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > >>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > >>>>>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > >>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > >>>>> intended > >>>>>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any > >>>>> views or > >>>>>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > >>>>> necessarily > >>>>>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are > >> not > >>>>> the > >>>>>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action > >>>>> based > >>>>>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact > the > >>>>> sender > >>>>>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue > Ltd > >>>>> is a > >>>>>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India > LLP > >>>>> is a > >>>>>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from > >> Shape > >>>>> Blue > >>>>>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated > in > >>>>> Brasil > >>>>>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty > >>>>> Ltd is > >>>>>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded > >>>>> under > >>>>>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
