Hi Simon,

thanks for the link - actually I have already read this - but Im still
seaking for some answeres :) :

- real world experience with DB HA in general  - is i better to use
haproxy(clustered/redudant) for mysql towards Galera cluster - or simply to
reference 2 nodes (1 as master, another as slave) with native ACS DB HA  -
silly question but anyway...
- my understanding - ACS just pings and connects to master or slave (all
replication etc, is done from my side, not from ACS) ?

Thanks again and any info is greatly appreciated.

Andrija

On 4 June 2015 at 16:23, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:

> Andrija,
>
> Here is the original design document, and it should give you a better idea
> of what is implemented today:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=34838207
>
> We have plans to test this in our lab soon, but just haven't got around to
> it yet.
>
> - Si
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 9:08 AM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: database high availability question vs haproxy
>
> Anyone :) ?
>
> On 31 May 2015 at 00:26, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would have a question on database HA feature in db.properties (
> >
> http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/reliability.html#configuring-database-high-availability
> > )
> >
> > If I understand correctly, it is up to the admin to provide appropriate
> > mysql HA (active-active, galera, etc) and ACS management server will
> JUST
> > try to connect to slaves if the master is down ?
> >
> > We are running Galera, with haproxy/keepalived, and by using stoping
> > haproxy, it takes i.e. 6sec for keepalived to detect haproxy is down, and
> > failover IP to another host.
> >
> > During these 6 seconds, ACS managemnt server goes dead, because of this
> DB
> > unavailability.
> >
> > So my wondering, is better to use ACS db HA feature, instead of
> > loadbalancer for this specific purpose ?
> > (we are also using haproxy/keepalived for management server loadbalancing
> > - 2 servers in backend...)
> >
> > Any experience shared is really appreciated !
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Reply via email to