Hi All, Will the CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan will work on the upcoming 4.5.3.
Thanks, Keerthi On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Hi Vadim, > > Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. > Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we > decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn’t > compile at times or functionality wasn’t tested before it entered master. > Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release > branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of “many > problems”. > > In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on > top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, > 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to > wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). > > > 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous > releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. > > This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be > sure there weren’t any “problems” in 4.6 that I didn’t know about (so they > could be addressed). It’s perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please > don’t give people the impression there are “many problems” while you cannot > name them. > > > In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you’ll > have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. > > If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. > > Regards, > Remi > > > On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote: > > >Dear Remi, > > > > My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were > >with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very > >difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user > >perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his > >problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than > >4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal > >fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good > >to take a risk of immediate update :) > > > >Vadim. > > > >On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > > >> Hi Vadim, > >> > >> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Remi > >> > >> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote: > >> > >> Dear Audrey, > >> > >> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created > >> bug report in JIRA > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]. Since 4.5.1 > >> this > >> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated > >> code > >> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of > >> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't > >> know > >> if OVS is back there. I doubt. > >> > >> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want > >> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? > >> > >> Vadim. > >> > >> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > >> > >> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. > >> > >> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and > >> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen > >> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure > >> PVLAN. > >> > >> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? > >> > >> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? > >> > >> Att., > >> Audrey > >> > >> ----- Mensagem original ----- > >> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <va...@kickcloud.net> > >> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" <audrey.bal...@unitelco.com.br> > >> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 > >> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan > >> > >> Hello Audrey, > >> > >> Look at this document: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN > >> [2] > >> [1] > >> XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin > >> for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS > >> 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was > >> present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. > >> Use > >> VLANs - it is more reliable. > >> > >> Vadim. > >> > >> On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > >> > >> Hello everybody! > >> > >> I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated > >> for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary > >> Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed > >> as Advanced without Security Groups. > >> > >> When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but > >> when > >> I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the > >> virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without > >> PVLAN works as expected. > >> > >> Does anyone have an idea about it? > >> > >> Looking into the log I could find the information below: > >> > >> 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > >> (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm > >> d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: > >> GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: > >> r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was > >> a failure communicating with the plugin. > >> > >> 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] > >> (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr > >> owable caught while executing command > >> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed > >> for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: > >> b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, > >> dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 > >> 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. > >> at > >> > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) > >> at > >> > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) > >> at > >> > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) > >> at > >> > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) > >> at > >> > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) > >> at > >> > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 > >> 5) > >> at > >> > com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302) > >> at > >> > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) > >> at > >> > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) > >> at > >> > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1 > >> 03) > >> at > >> > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53 > >> ) > >> at > >> > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) > >> at > >> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) > >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) > >> at > >> > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.j > >> ava:178) > >> at > >> > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292 > >> ) > >> at > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) > >> at > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) > >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > >> > >> Thanks for your help! > >> > >> Att., > >> Audrey > > > > Links: > > ------ > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN > >[2] > > > > > > > >Links: > >------ > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 > >[2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN >
