>From a technical or code perspective? How would changing to openvswitch change anything in this scenario?
-- Erik On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > I don't think that would work. Instead, we could change to openvswitch as > that makes it way more flexibele. As far as I know there are no plans / is > no one working on that right now. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 06 Jan 2016, at 23:52, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > A theoretical change could be to switch from VLAN assigned VIFs to using > > the VLAN feature in Linux kernel. That would give interface names like > > eth0.100 instead of eth0-6. Would need one NIC for each physical Network > > though. > > > > And I do not know if all hypervisors supports trunk ports. > > > > > > Erik > > > > Den mandag 28. desember 2015 skrev Davide Pala <davide.p...@gesca.it> > > følgende: > > > >> Hi all. > >> I've read about vpc and tiers, now i've a question. VPC's virtual router > >> is a virtual machine and as the other vm it have some limit such as the > max > >> number of nic that an hypervisor can provide to vm (in xenserver this > limit > >> is set to 7) ...this mean that the vpc can have only 6 tier? there is a > way > >> to bypass this limit? > >> thanks to all > >> > >> Davide Pala > >> Infrastructure Specialist > >> Gesca srl > >> > >> Via degli Olmetti, 18 > >> 00060 Formello (Roma) > >> Office: +39 06 9040661 > >> Fax: +39 06 90406666 > >> E-mail: davide.p...@gesca.it <javascript:;><mailto:davide.p...@gesca.it > >> <javascript:;>> > >> Web: www.gesca.it<http://www.gesca.it/> > >> > >> [Descrizione: Descrizione: Descrizione: Descrizione: Descrizione: > >> Descrizione: logoGescaPER FIRMA] > >> > >> >
