Hi Dag, thank you for your feedback.We're going to introduce a new cluster. Not really happy with that, but way better than risking any data loss.
- Stephan Am Montag, den 12.09.2016, 08:24 +0000 schrieb Dag Sonstebo: > Hi Stephan, > > Zone-wide (i.e. multi-cluster) primary storage is only supported on > KVM and VMware, not XenServer. > > Just so we are on the same page though – this applies at a LUN level > – in other words two XenServer pools can never share a LUN, but they > can both use different LUNs from the same storage backend. > > And yes – to answer your question – using the same LUN on multiple > clusters is pretty much guaranteed to cause you problems – most > likely data corruption and complete loss of data. > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 09/09/2016, 14:24, "Stephan Seitz" <s.seitz@secretresearchfacility > .com> wrote: > > Hi! > > I've recently expanded our XenServer Pool and had to notice that > E5- > 2630 v2 are far different from E5-2630 v4. Due to Dell's R630 > BIOS i'm > unable to use Intel FlexMigration. So I'ld loose the live- > migration > feature. > Anyway. I'ld start introducing a new XenServer Pool (ACS Cluster) > with > that newer CPU Generation. > > My Question is: Is it possible to use the same (FC/presetup) > Primary > Storages for both Clusters? > I've seen cluster.storage.operations.exclude (which defaults to > false) > but currently don't know if this would need to be set to true on > the > second cluster. > > Would you expect any problems running two XenServer Pools (say: > two ACS > Clusters) with the same Primary Storages? > > Thanks for any advice! > > cheers, > > - Stephan > > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > >
