SSVM reports the secondary storage space, but doesn't run from secondary storage. you're seeing "Secondary Storage 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB" because the SSVM isn't running.
If you can't start the SSVM again, then the host(s) likely have the stale NFS issue. If no VMs are running on the host that had the SSVM on it, then try restarting that. Otherwise you need to look at the logs on that host. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -----Original Message----- From: 조대형 [mailto:carl...@renet.kr] Sent: 18 January 2017 08:48 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack 4.7 Secondary Storage problem There is no space on Secodary Storage. Secondary Storage 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB SO, SSVM is not up. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:37 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack 4.7 Secondary Storage problem Hi there, Chances are that you have stale NFS sessions on the Secondary Storage VM(s). Try rebooting the SSVM(s) If that doesn't clear the problem, can you run /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh on the SSVM and report back the results. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -----Original Message----- From: sachin patil [mailto:sachin931...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 January 2017 08:07 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.7 Secondary Storage problem Can you please share your management_server logs On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:47 PM, 조대형 <carl...@renet.kr> wrote: > Hi, all > > I am facing secondary storage problem. > > I am using NFS Server to use primary and secondary storage. > > After rebooting the host, > > In Dashboard Cloudstack , it says Secondary Storage 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB > > Primary Storage is okay. > > > > After all, system VMs are not up. It was working fine before rebooting. > > > > I have tried several times of restart of Management service. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > >